08 DEC, 2020
Το Εκλ&omicron...Read More
20th October 2020
The UK experience and how will, Cyprus Courts treat them?
In a digitalised word e-signature is a key tool with enormous power that works as a type of guarantee in people’s hands. It is itss guarantee feature that is causing problems of trust and questions around the matter of going from sign to e-sign. Although signatures are not hundred percent failsafe or valid, their use has been around for centuries. The mark tradition dates back from Romans who were using signatures during the supremacy of Valentinian III in 439 A.D. and later on from the State of Frauds Act enacted by the English Parliament in 1677 making the signature today’s formal acclamation of assent, to 2004 when the banking traditional signature method was replaced to the Chip and PIN system which reduced fraudulent use of credit and debit cards by £65m to £439m in 2005 and finally to Obama’s Autopen stylus and Atwood’s LongPen signatures.
Since the introduction of the Electronic Communications Act of 2000, the e-signature has legally replaced the ink and feather quill signature. The UK followed the European Union’s eIDAS Regulations which after Brexit were amended to repeal the provisions relating to e-ID and they slightly amend the provisions relating to trust services for electronic transactions. And even though there were forty to fifty Statutes that must have been altered so the handwritten signature could go virtual, UK Courts have always taken a pragmatic yet very flexible approach to the type of signatures that are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings. It is strongly believed that in today’s environment, where proceedings are conducted via electronic communications UK Courts will be even more flexible with the validity of electronic signatures and signing on the dotted line can be terminated if authenticating intention can be proven.
In the past, English Courts recognised as binding signatures a name typed at the bottom of emails and signatures without even using the signatory’s name such as “Servant to Mr Sperling”. To make things better, in the well-known case of Yuen v Wong which brought to the table the requirement for individuals to sign deeds “in the presence of a witness who attests the signature”, the First-Tier Tribunal left hope for witnesses to be able to witness the signature of deeds via Skype video. Of course, today this gives room for writers to suggest that the Covid-19 emergency may mean that the UK Government must give clear answers to video witnessing all types of documents as part of its emergency legislation measures and follow Jerseys’ path. Currently, video witnessing of wills signing is temporarily allowed in the UK which sounds like a very promising approach towards complete signature digitalisation.
Provision 7 of the ECA 2000 states that any document with e-signature is sufficient to establish evidence that the document is genuine and undisputed excluding where the opponent can adduce evidence to the contrary and thus challenge its authenticity. The evidential weight to be given to the electronic signature has been left to the discretion of the judge to decide.
In June 2018 Cyprus implemented Law 55(I)/2018, which incorporated Regulation (EU) 910/2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions in the Internal Market (eIDAS).
The eIDAS Regulation clarified electronic signatures by splitting them into three broad types:
According to Article 9(1) of Law 55(I)/2018, subject to the provisions of the Evidence Law, electronic signatures are admissible in all civil and criminal proceedings before the Cyprus Courts. By virtue of section 25 an electronic signature cannot be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in proceedings, only because it was made in electronic format or does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic signature. The EU attempted to shape long term digital trust and confidence and urge more businesses to embrace the digital atmosphere and carry out dealings electronically by giving the long-term winning opportunity to the Courts and judges to examine all the cases on their own facts and decide the validity of e-signatures on a case by case basis.
The real question is whether Cyprus Courts will embrace the EU’s view. To time, no court has been called to consider the validity of an electronic signature and as such there is no clear interpretation as to how e-signatures will be treated by the judges and how the legislation will be interpreted. Recent amendments to Cyprus’ Law bring light at the end of the tunnel. In the Evidence Law (CAP 9) article 2, the definition of “document” was revised to comprise e-documents and any document that includes electronic signatures, electronic seals, electronic time stamps etc. Even more promising, the Companies Law (CAP 113), article 37A(1) states that every document sent or delivered to the Companies’ Registrar for filing or issued by the Companies’ Registrar can be e-signed. With such promising Law amendments already being made we are confident enough that Cyprus courts will be flexible in interpreting the law and adapt to digital signatures which are a concept more than the logo of a business given the crisis we are going through today.
JCC Payment Systems Ltd acts as the primary trust service provider in Cyprus and the Cyprus Stock Exchange is the Local Registration Authority which facilitates the issuance of qualified certificates for e-signatures for natural people, natural people associated with legal person and certificates for electronic seals for legal persons.
Cyprus will quickly strive for excellence. The Cyprus Courts will confidently follow the EU footprints to build trust and urge companies to embrace the unavoidable virtual business world. To remain attractive, relevant and competitive as a business and investment destination, it is vital for Cyprus to commence and develop its transition to digital renovation. The time has come when Cyprus will foster national digital identities and be able to authenticate reliably, sign in digital form, renovate the infrastructure in which digital transactions are administered and accelerate the development of functional digital solutions. Digital transformation will create a more flexible legal and business environment, manage administration costs, sustain long-term potential savings and enhance environmentally friendly operations therefore forming a catalyst for change in Cyprus business transactions and the entire market.
The World Bank, ‘Developing a Comprehensive National Retail Payments Strategy’ (October 2012, The World Bank) available at <http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/839121469729131991/pdf/84076-REPLACEMENT-FILE-PUBLIC-Developing-comprehensive-national-retail-payments-strategy.pdf> accessed 7 October 2020.
 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.
 The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
 Law Commission, ‘Electronic Execution of Documents’, available at: <https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/electronic-execution-of-documents/> accessed 9 October 2020.
 Goods of Sperling (1863) 3 SW & T 272; 164 ER 1279.
 Yuen v Wong (2020) First-tier Tribunal 2016/1089, 8 January 2020
 The Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, Section 1(3).
 Emma Humphreys, ‘Virtual witnessing: a sign of the times?’ available at <https://blog.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/post/102g1xc/virtual-witnessing-a-sign-of-the-times> accessed 9 October 2020.
 The Gazette, ‘Witnessing will signatures via video link is now permitted in Jersey’, (28 July 2020) available at <https://www.thegazette.co.uk/wills-and-probate/content/103579> accessed 9 October 2020.
 The Wills Act 1837 (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Order 2020, available at <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/952/pdfs/uksi_20200952_en.pdf> accessed 9 October 2020/
 Electronic Communications Act 2000, Section 7(1).
 CyLAW, ‘Ο περί της Εφαρμογής του Κανονισμού (Ε.Ε.) αριθ. 910/2014, σχετικά με την Ηλεκτρονική Ταυτοποίηση και τις Υπηρεσίες Εμπιστοσύνης για τις Ηλεκτρονικές Συναλλαγές στην Εσωτερική Αγορά, Νόμος του 2018 (Ν. 55(I)/2018)’, available at <http://www.cylaw.org/nomoi/indexes/2018_1_55.html> accessed 11 October 2020.
 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, Article 3(10)
 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, Article 3(11), Article 26.
 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, Article 3(12).
 CyLAW, ‘Ο περί της Εφαρμογής του Κανονισμού (Ε.Ε.) αριθ. 910/2014, σχετικά με την Ηλεκτρονική Ταυτοποίηση και τις Υπηρεσίες Εμπιστοσύνης για τις Ηλεκτρονικές Συναλλαγές στην Εσωτερική Αγορά, Νόμος του 2018 (Ν. 55(I)/2018)’, available at <http://www.cylaw.org/nomoi/indexes/2018_1_55.html> accessed 11 October 2020, Article 9(1).
 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, Article 25.
 European Commission, ‘Building online trust and confidence: Electronic signatures, seals and trust services now valid throughout EU’, (30 June 2016) available at <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/building-online-trust-and-confidence-electronic-signatures-seals-and-trust-services-now-valid> accessed 12 October 2020.
 CyLAW, ‘Ο περί Αποδείξεως Νόμος (ΚΕΦ.9)’ available at <http://www.cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/non-ind/0_9/full.html> accessed 12 October 2020; Evidence Law (CAP.9), Article 2.
 CyLAW, ‘Ο περί Εταιρειών Νόμος (ΚΕΦ.113)’, available at <http://cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/non-ind/0_113/index.html> accessed 12 October 2020; Companies Law (CAP.113), article 37A(1).
 Republic of Cyprus - Department of Electronic Communications <https://dec.dmrid.gov.cy/dmrid/dec/dec.nsf/serviceproviders_en/serviceproviders_en?OpenDocument> accessed 12 October 2020.
 Cyprus Stock Exchange, ‘Electronic Signatures’ available at <http://www.cse.com.cy/en-GB/Electronic-Signatures/> accessed 12 October 2020.
 OECD, ‘Key Issues for Digital Transformation in the G20’, (Berlin, Germany, 12 January 2017), available at <https://www.oecd.org/g20/key-issues-for-digital-transformation-in-the-g20.pdf> accessed 14 October 2020.
 Accenture, ‘Fuel the core of your media and entertainment business: three growth strategies’, (2019) available at <https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-97/accenture-digital-transformation-media-businesses.pdf> accessed 14 October 2020.
 Accenture, ‘Digital Cyprus: Catalyst for Change’ Volume 1 (2018) available at <https://www.oeb.org.cy/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Accenture-Digital-Cyprus-Catalyst-for-Change-2018-LowR.pdf> accessed 14 October 2020; OECD, ‘Key Issues for Digital Transformation in the G20’, (Berlin, Germany, 12 January 2017), available at <https://www.oecd.org/g20/key-issues-for-digital-transformation-in-the-g20.pdf> accessed 14 October 2020